4.4 Article

Parallel Miocene-dominated diversification of the lichen-forming fungal genus Oropogon (Ascomycota: Parmeliaceae) in different continents

Journal

TAXON
Volume 66, Issue 6, Pages 1269-1281

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.12705/666.1

Keywords

biogeography; molecular evolution; molecular systematics; Oropogon; substitution rate

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences
  2. Universidad Distrital
  3. Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CGL2013-42498-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lineages with broad, intercontinental distributions can provide insight into factors that influence diversity across both temporal and geographic scales. Lichens are well known for distinct biogeographic distribution patterns, including a high number of lineages with intercontinental distributions. The lichen-forming fungal genus Oropogon, from one of the largest families of lichen-forming ascomycetes, Parmeliaceae, occurs in both Asia and the Neotropics. How this genus obtained this disjunct distribution is not currently known. To better understand factors shaping diversity in Oropogon, we (i) estimated the timing of diversification of major clades within this genus; (ii) inferred the historical biogeography of Oropogon; and (iii) identified factors that potentially affected the distribution and evolution of this genus. Our results suggest that the genus originally radiated during the early Miocene, with subsequent diversification events occurring during the middle Miocene. Ancestral area reconstructions for Oropogon suggest that the genus was either widespread with subsequent separate diversification in Asia and America or originated in the New World (America), with subsequent migration to Asia. We hypothesize that the Mi-1 glaciation impacted diversification of Oropogon species in Asia, and that the rise of major mountain ranges, such as the Himalayas, helped promote diversification in Oropogon in the Old World.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available