4.7 Article

Development of data-independent acquisition workflows for metabolomic analysis on a quadrupole-orbitrap platform

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages 128-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.11.048

Keywords

Liquid chromatograph; Mass spectrometer; Data-dependent acquisition; Metabolomics; Orbitrap; Papillary thyroid carcinoma

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81430056, 31420103905, 21305005, 31400695]
  2. 111 Project [B07001]
  3. Lam Chung Nin Foundation for Systems Biomedicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Untargeted metabolomic profiling has been widely used in recent years. However, the low reproducibility of the data-dependent acquisition (DDA) strategy presents a major bottleneck that considerably limits the reliability of metabolomic studies in biological and clinical research. The data-independent acquisition (DIA) strategy is proposed to solve the above-mentioned problem, and it is gaining popularity. This paper presents a novel approach for performing metabolomic analysis using an untargeted, liquid chromatography data independent mass spectrometry (LC-DIA-MS) strategy on a quadrupole-Orbitrap platform. Using chemical standards and metabolites extracted from serum samples, we optimized the LC-DIA-MS parameters to analyze hydrophilic metabolites and lipids. The quantitative performance and analytical reliability were evaluated, and the performances of DIA, DDA, and all-ion fragmentation mode were compared. Finally, as a proof of concept, we applied the constructed DIA workflow to a comparative metabolomic study of papillary thyroid carcinoma (TC) serum samples. Several metabolites, including carnitine, trimethylamine N-oxide, and some amino acids, significantly changed between patients and healthy controls. This study demonstrated the feasibility and advantage of the DIA strategy on untargeted metabolomic analysis for biological study and clinical biomarker screening.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available