4.7 Article

Comparative study of different approaches for multivariate image analysis in HPTLC fingerprinting of natural products such as plant resin

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 162, Issue -, Pages 72-79

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2016.10.023

Keywords

High-performance thin-layer chromatography; Image analysis; Pattern recognition technique; Phenolics profile; Plant resins

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of Serbia [172017]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering the introduction of phytochemical fingerprint analysis, as a method of screening the complex natural products for the presence of most bioactive compounds, use of chemometric classification methods, application of powerful scanning and image capturing and processing devices and algorithms, advancement in development of novel stationary phases as well as various separation modalities, high-performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) fingerprinting is becoming attractive and fruitful field of separation science. Multivariate image analysis is crucial in the light of proper data acquisition. In a current study, different image processing procedures were studied and compared in detail on the example of HPTLC chromatograms of plant resins. In that sense, obtained variables such as gray intensities of pixels along the solvent front, peak area and mean values of peak were used as input data and compared to obtained best classification models. Important steps in image analysis, baseline removal, denoising, target peak alignment and normalization were pointed out. Numerical data set based on mean value of selected bands and intensities of pixels along the solvent front proved to be the most convenient for planar-chromatographic profiling, although required at least the basic knowledge on image processing methodology, and could be proposed for further investigation in HPLTC fingerprinting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available