4.7 Article

Sequence specific recognition of HIV-1 dsDNA in the large amount of normal dsDNA based upon nicking enzyme signal amplification and triplex DNA

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages 9-13

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.05.043

Keywords

HIV dsDNA; Nicking enzyme signal amplification (NESA); Triplex DNA; Y-shaped structure; Fluorescence

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21375153]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A sensitive fluorescent strategy for sequence specific recognition of HIV dsDNA was established based upon Nicking Enzyme Signal Amplification (NESA) and triplex formation. dsDNA sequence from the site 7960 to site 7991 of the HIV1 dsDNA gene was designed as target dsDNA, which was composed of two complementary strands Oligonucleotide 1 with the sequence of 3'-CTT CGT TAT CTT' CTT CTT CCA CCT CTC TCT CT -5' (Oligo1) and Oligonucleotide 2 with the sequence of 5'-GAA GGA ATA GAA GAA GAA GGT GGA GAG AGA GA -3' (Oligo-2). As a proof of concept, Oligonucleotide 5'-6-FAM-GAG GTG GAG CTG CGC GAC TCC TCC TCT CTC TCT CTC CAC CTC-BHQ-1-3'(Oligo-4) acted as molecular beacon(MB) probe, Oligonucleotide 5'-CTT CCT TAT CTT CTT CTT CCA AAA GGA GTC GCG-3' (Oligo-7) acted as assistant probe. In the presence of target dsDNA, Oligo-4 and Oligo-7 hybridized with target dsDNA through triplex formation and formed Y-shaped structure, NESA occurred with further addition of Nt.BbvCI, accompanied with the release of fluorescent DNA fragment circularly, resulted in the increase of fluorescence intensity. Under the optimum conditions, the fluorescence intensity was linear with the concentration of target dsDNA over the range from 100 pM to 200 nM, the linear regression equation was I = 1.266 C + 84.3 (C: nmol/L, R-2 = 0.991), with a detection limit of 65 pM. Moreover, the effect of coexisted other dsDNA was investigated as well, and satisfactory results were obtained.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available