4.6 Article

An improved FAST feature extraction based on RANSAC method of vision/SINS integrated navigation system in GNSS-denied environments

Journal

ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH
Volume 60, Issue 12, Pages 2660-2671

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.017

Keywords

Vision/SINS integrated system; Feature extraction; Features from accelerated segment test (FAST); Random sample consensus (RANSAC)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51509049, 51679047]
  2. Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Fund [JBH-Z16044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although Strapdown Inertial Navigation System (SINS) and Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) integrated navigation system has been widely used in modern kinematic positioning and navigation due to its numerous advantages, the GNSS signal is easily disturbed or blocked by the surroundings, which will reduce the system accuracy significantly. So some other alternated aiding techniques should be studied on. With the rapid development of the digital imaging sensors and computer techniques, the vision/SINS integrated system is gradually important. Since the feature extraction is the key and basic technique, superior feature extractor can improve the integrated navigation accuracy. In order to improve the robustness and accuracy of the feature extraction, an improved Features from Accelerated Segment Test (FAST) feature extraction based on the Random Sample Consensus (RANSAC) method is proposed to remove the mismatched points in this manuscript. Furthermore, the performance of this new method has been estimated through experiments. And the results have shown that the proposed feature extractor cannot only effectively extract features, but also reduce the positioning error availably, making the proposed FAST feature extraction based on RANSAC feasible and efficient. (C) 2017 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available