4.6 Article

How to manage innovation processes in extensive networks: A longitudinal study

Journal

INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT
Volume 67, Issue -, Pages 88-105

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.09.014

Keywords

Innovation process; Business network; Innovation network; Managing; Collaborative innovation; Diversity

Funding

  1. Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation [70029/13]
  2. Regional Council of Satakunta [A70036]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we examine the managing of the full innovation process, from visioning to commercialization, in extensive networks. By drawing on the IMP, strategic network, and innovation network literatures, we develop a comprehensive picture of the management activities when 'mobilizing', 'orchestrating', and 'involving' actors in working towards the innovation aim in such network settings. Through using two longitudinal case studies the one pursuing radical and the other incremental innovation -we provide an empirically refined understanding of seven key management activities (motivating, resourcing, goal setting/refining, consolidating, coordinating, controlling, and leveraging), which are needed throughout the innovation process to turn the diversity of an innovation network into an opportunity rather than an obstacle. We demonstrate how actor diversity and the type of innovation (radical or incremental) shape the management activities, and map a dynamic actor composition that evolves alongside the innovation process. The longitudinal data highlights the consequences of the presence or lack of management activities, and the interlinkages between activities throughout the process. Our findings also provide insights for practitioners on how to cope with the increasing tendency to involve diverse stakeholders in innovation by pinpointing the critical management activities that can be employed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available