4.5 Article

Thaumasiovibrio occultus gen. nov sp nov and Thaumasiovibrio subtropicus sp nov within the family Vibrionaceae, isolated from coral reef seawater off Ishigaki Island, Japan

Journal

SYSTEMATIC AND APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 5, Pages 290-296

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2017.04.003

Keywords

Vibrionaceae; Thaumasiovibrio; New genus; Genomic taxonomy; Coral reef; Seawater

Funding

  1. Strategic Japanese-Brazilian Cooperative Program, Biomass and Bioenergy
  2. JSPS-CAPES bilateral cooperative program
  3. Kaken [16K1497806]
  4. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan [221S0002]
  5. CAPES
  6. CNPq
  7. FAPERJ

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two phylogenetically distinct Vibrionaceae strains C4I1189(T) and C4V358(T) isolated from reef seawater off Ishigaki Island, Japan, in 2014 were studied with advanced genome-based taxonomy approaches. All aspects of phylogenetic (16S rRNA phylogeny, MLSA), phenotypic and genetic (ANI, DDH, AAI, and the number of core genes) cohesions between the two identified species were high enough to propose them as members of a new genus within the family Vibrionaceae. Consequently, an eighth genus Thaumasiovibrio gen. nov. is proposed that contains two new species Thaumasiovibrio occultus sp. nov. strain C411189(T) (=DSM 101554(T) = JCM 31629(T)) (type species) and Thaumasiovibrio subtropicus sp. nov. strain C4V358(T) (=DSM 101555(T) = JCM 31630(T)). Thaumasiovibrio species were phylogenetically distinct from the other Vibrionaceae species based on pyrH gene sequences. The combination of catalase negative, sensitivity to vibriostatic agent 0/129, and green colony formation on TCBS for the phylogenetically affiliated strains was the diagnostic features for the current tentative identification of this genus. (C) 2017 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available