4.8 Article

Surface Reactivity of Li2MnO3: First-Principles and Experimental Study

Journal

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
Volume 9, Issue 50, Pages 44222-44230

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b14826

Keywords

surface reactivity; XPS; single crystal; AES; first-principles calculations

Funding

  1. Conseil General des Pyrenees Atlantiques
  2. French Research Network on the Electrochemical Energy Storage (RS2E)
  3. Region Nouvelle Aquitaine
  4. French National Research Agency (STORE-EX Labex) [ANR-10-LABX-76-01]
  5. GENCI-CINES [2016-c2016086920]
  6. FEDER (European Fund for Regional Development) fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article deals with the surface reactivity of (001)-oriented Li2MnO3 crystals investigated from a multi technique approach combining material synthesis, X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (XPS), scanning electron microscopy, Auger electron spectroscopy, and first-principles calculations. Li2MnO3 is considered as a model compound suitable to go further in the understanding of the role of tetravalent manganese atoms in the surface reactivity of layered lithium oxides. The knowledge of the surface properties of such materials is essential to understand the mechanisms involved in parasitic phenomena responsible for early aging or poor storage performances of lithium-ion batteries. The surface reactivity was probed through the adsorption of SO2 gas molecules on large Li2MnO3 crystals to be able to focus the XPS beam on the top of the (001) surface. A chemical mapping and XPS characterization of the material before and after SO2 adsorption show in particular that the adsorption is homogeneous at the micro- and nanoscale and involves Mn reduction, whereas first-principles calculations on a slab model of the surface allow us to conclude that the most energetically favorable species formed is a sulfate with charge transfer implying reduction of Mn.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available