4.5 Article

Void handling using Geo-Opportunistic Routing in underwater wireless sensor networks

Journal

COMPUTERS & ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 64, Issue -, Pages 365-379

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.016

Keywords

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks; Geography Opportunistic Routing; Local maximum; Convex hull; Void handling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) consist of a group of acoustic sensor nodes that report the sensed information to the sink nodes at the surface level. The factors like multipath fading, path loss, Doppler spread, limited battery power, and high mobility void region cause UWSNs to become spatially variable. In this paper, the idea of Geography-based Opportunistic Routing (GOR) is applied to advance the packet towards the destination and to handle the void problem. The proposed design is termed as Void Handling using Geo-Opportunistic Routing (VHGOR). In executing so, a heuristic algorithm comprising two metrics, namely OREPP and NCD for optimal forwarder selection is proposed. Additionally, a void handling mechanism is also proposed that handles void in two ways. Quick hull algorithm that makes a convex hull assists to identify whether the void is convex or concave. When the node approaches a convex void, reconstruction of convex hull helps to determine an alternative way to resume the greedy forwarding if the node has neighbors within its proximity. Failure of convex void handling during communication void makes VHGOR switch to concave void handling (or) recovery mode to recover the packet from local maximum node and to route the packet to the destination. At the end of simulation, the proposed VHGOR results considerably improve the network performance when compared with the existing solutions, both in sparse and very dense networks. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available