4.0 Article

Assessing the effects of gut bacteria manipulation on the development of the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera; Tephritidae)

Journal

SYMBIOSIS
Volume 74, Issue 2, Pages 97-105

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13199-017-0493-4

Keywords

Bactrocera dorsalis; Gut bacteria; Fruit fly; Fitness; Mass rearing

Categories

Funding

  1. International Atomic Energy Agency (CRP) [17153]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31661143045, 31371945, 31071690]
  3. Crop Disease and Insect Pest Monitoring and Control Program - Ministry of Agriculture of People's Republic of China
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2662015PY148]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a serious menace to agricultural production worldwide. In order to prevent further damage, it is of paramount important that cost-effective strategies should be developed for their management. Gut bacteria has established diverse relationships with their insect hosts, which could be exploited in pest management programs to improve on control efficiency. In this study, gut bacteria isolates identified by culture dependent technique were incorporated into larval diets in an attempt to understand the roles they play in the development and survival of oriental fruit fly. From our results, the isolated bacteria belonged to four different phyla including the Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. The response of the fly to different gut isolates varied greatly. Diets enriched with Enterococcus phoeniculicola had lower larval developmental duration, higher pupal weight, and an increased percentage survival. On the other hand, diets supplemented with Lactobacillus lactis had negative effects on B. dorsalis development. This study provides clues on how symbiotic bacteria could be exploited in mass rearing for an efficient implementation of the Sterile Insect Technique (SIT) in pest management programs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available