Journal
13TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, GHGT-13
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages 1409-1423Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.1265
Keywords
Post-combustion CO2 capture; Aspen Hysys (TM) simulation; Absorption-regeneration process configurations; Lean and rich vapor compression; Cement plant flue gas
Funding
- European Cement Research Academy (ECRA)
- HeidelbergCement Company
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In order to reduce the operating costs of post-combustion CO2 capture process by absorption-regeneration using amine based solvents for its application in the cement industry, the present study was focused on the Aspen HysysTM simulation of different CO2 capture process configurations (namely conventional configuration, Rich Solvent Recycle (RSR), Solvent Split Flow (SSF) and Lean/Rich Vapor Compression (L/RVC)) applied to the flue gas coming from the Norcem Brevik cement plant in Norway and using three different solvents, namely: monoethanolamine (MEA), piperazine (PZ) and piperazine-methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) blend. For each configuration and solvent, a parametric study was carried out in order to identify the specific operating conditions (flow rates ratio (L/G), split fraction, injection stage in the columns, flash pressure, etc.) minimizing the solvent regeneration energy and highlighting the energetical interest of such configurations. Energy savings of almost 30% were estimated with the RVC configuration and MDEA+PZ blend. A decrease of the condenser cooling energy was also noted. As perspectives, other configurations (such as InterCooled Absorber (ICA)) and combination of configurations will be considered in order to further reduce the energy consumption of the process. In addition to OPEX calculations, the consequence in terms of CAPEX of implementing each process configuration will have to be estimated for evaluating more precisely the global economic interest of using alternative process configurations for the application to cement plant flue gases. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available