4.4 Article

Perioperative thromboprophylaxis in severely obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: insights from a French national survey

Journal

SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages 320-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.08.497

Keywords

Obesity; Bariatric surgery; Venous thromboembolism; Thromboprophylaxis; Survey

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VIE) is a leading cause of death in obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery (BS), but there is neither consensus nor high-level guidelines yet on VTE prophylaxis in this specific population. Objective: We aimed to evaluate patterns of BS perioperative thromboprophylaxis practices. Setting: French obesity specialized care centers (CSO), which are tertiary care referral hospitals for the most severe cases of obesity Methods: A detailed questionnaire survey (11 opened, 15 closed questions) investigating their prophylactic schemes of anticoagulation (molecule, dose, weight-adjustment, duration, associated measures, follow-up) was sent to the 37 CSO. Results: Completion rate was 92%. Over 90% of respondents indicated using low molecular weight heparin. Enoxaparin was the most commonly used molecule (89%), twice daily (71%), started mostly 6 hours after BS (74%), whereas fondaparinux (9%), dalteparin (6%), and tinzaparin (6%) were less often prescribed. Dosing varied significantly according to centers from 4000 to 12,000 IU/d, with the most commonly used dose being 8000 IU once daily, 83%, as well as treatment duration (1 week, 9%; 3 weeks, 47%). Half CSO adjusted low molecular weight heparin dose to weight. Biological monitoring was performed in 88%. Only 1 center followed systematically anti-Xa activity. Associated measures such as elastic stoking or intermittent pneumatic compression were used in 32% and 26%, respectively, and both were used in 39%. Conclusion: This study finds significant discrepancies in thromboprophylaxis practices in obese patients undergoing BS, particularly with respect to treatment duration and dose adjustment, highlighting the urgent need for improved implementation of existing clinical practice guidelines in this VTE high-risk population. (C) 2017 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available