4.7 Article

Influence of large particle size - up to 1.2 mm - and morphology on wear resistance in NiCrBSi/WC laser cladded composite coatings

Journal

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
Volume 311, Issue -, Pages 365-373

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.12.110

Keywords

Laser cladding; Composites; Particle size; Morphology; Wear resistance

Funding

  1. European Social Fund (ESF)
  2. Laserco DT
  3. [FIRST DOCA HYCOLASE ECV320600FD006F/916988]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper aims at studying the influence of the reinforcement particle size and morphology on the wear resis-tance properties of NiCrBSi-based composites. Numerous papers have already been written on this subject but almost all of them studied the conventional particle size for laser cladding (i.e. between 20 and 200 mu m). The objective of this study is to see the influence of coarser reinforcement particles, up to 1.2 mm, and the influence of the morphology (spherical and random shaped) on the coatings erosive and sliding wear resistance. Laser clad coatings were deposited on low carbon steel substrate S235JR with various amounts of WC/W2C particles up to 50 vol.%. The coatings were processed by using a 3.8 kW High Power Diode Laser (HPDL). Spherical tungsten carbide particles from 40 mu m up to 1200 mu m were used in this study as well as random shaped particles from 40 mu m to 400 mu m. To assess the influence of the reinforcement particle properties on wear properties, wheel tests and pin-on-disk tests were performed on each composition. From this study, it can be concluded that there is an obvious advantage in using larger particles (750-1200 mu m) in harsh conditions while smaller particles (40-160 mu m) improve the resistance in sliding conditions. The effect of morphology has not been proved significant (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available