4.8 Article

Highly fluorescent carbon dots from peanut shells as potential probes for copper ion: The optimization and analysis of the synthetic process

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY CHEMISTRY
Volume 5, Issue -, Pages 1-10

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtchem.2017.04.004

Keywords

Fluorescence carbon dots; Photoluminescence; Sensing; Wastes

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB15030301]
  2. Knowledge Innovation Program of the Institute of Soil Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences [ISSASIP1634]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The use of natural materials, a renewable resource, instead of chemicals as carbon precursors for simple synthesis of fluorescent carbon dots (FCDs) remains a significant challenge. Here, we report the preparation of FCDs with a photoluminescence (PL) quantum yield (QY) of 10.58% from peanut shells via one-pot pyrolysis treatment optimized by using a central composite experiment design. Optimum pyrolysis conditions were found to be 400 degrees C temperature, 4 h duration, and 70 g peanut shell weight. The as-prepared FCDs possess unique excitation-dependent behavior, good water dispersibility and high photostability. The results of Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy to analyze the pyrolytic process indicated the complete combustion of peanut shells happened at 3 and 4 h at 400 degrees C. The PL intensity of the FCDs was not always proportional to the corresponding QY value in our work due to the different amount of carbon-rich residues after the pyrolysis process. Fluorescence-quenching trials were conducted to analyze their sensitivity and selectivity in Cu2+ detection. The detection limit was found to be 4.8 mM. Our pyrolysis treatment of peanut shells for preparing FCDs is not only a green and facile method but also a means of recycling peanut shells. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available