4.5 Article

Application of Markov chains and Monte Carlo simulations for developing pavement performance models for urban network management

Journal

STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 1169-1181

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15732479.2017.1402064

Keywords

Markov chains; urban pavements; performance models; network level analysis; pavement management; probabilistic models; transportation engineering

Funding

  1. FONDEF-CONICYT-CHILE [D09I1019]
  2. FONDAP-CONICYT-CHILE [15110017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing performance models developed for interurban pavements are not applicable to urban pavements due to differences in traffic demands and deterioration trends. The objective of the study was to develop performance models for the management of urban pavement networks. Markov chains and Monte Carlo simulation were applied to account for the probabilistic nature of pavements deterioration over time, using data collected in the field. One of the advantages of this methodology is that it can be used by local agencies with scarce technical resources and historical data. Eight performance models were developed and successfully validated for asphalt and concrete pavements in humid, dry and Mediterranean climates with different functional hierarchies. The resulting models evidence the impact of design, traffic demand, climate and construction standards on urban pavements performance. Predicted service life of asphalt and concrete pavements in primary networks are consistent with design standards. However, pavements in secondary and local networks present shorter and longer service life compared to design life, respectively. Climate is a relevant factor for asphalt pavements, where higher deterioration was observed compared to that expected. Opposite to this, no relevant differences between design and performance can be attributed to climate in concrete pavements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available