4.7 Article

Stochastic post-disaster functionality recovery of community building portfolios II: Application

Journal

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
Volume 69, Issue -, Pages 106-117

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2017.05.004

Keywords

Recovery modeling; Building portfolio; Functionality state; Building restoration; Continuous time Markov Chain; Community resilience

Funding

  1. Center for Risk-Based Community Resilience Planning, a Center of Excellence - U.S. National Institute of Science and Technology (NIST) [70NANB15H044]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Part I of this two-part paper introduced a building portfolio recovery model (BPRM) to forecast the stochastic recovery process of building portfolios within a community following an extreme hazard event. The BPRM models restoration of individual building-level functionalities as a discrete state, continuous time Markov Chain, while it models portfolio-level recovery by aggregating the building-level restoration processes in both temporal and spatial dimensions. In this paper, we illustrate the implementation of the BPRM to project the building portfolio recovery of a mid-size community following a predefined scenario earthquake. The recovery analysis integrates the engineering process of building reconstructions with available community resources and social-economic characteristics of different population groups. The spatial variations in recovery speed in different residential zones within the community reflect the disparities in resourcefulness and recoverability of homeowners with different social and economic status. In addition, sensitivity studies are performed to investigate the capability of the BPRM to quantify the impact of candidate pre-disaster mitigation strategies on the building portfolio recovery time and trajectory, illustrating the potential use of the BPRM in supporting risk-informed community resilience planning. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available