4.7 Article

Long Noncoding RNA-1604 Orchestrates Neural Differentiation through the miR-200c/ZEB Axis

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 36, Issue 3, Pages 325-336

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2749

Keywords

Stem cells; Neural differentiation; lncRNA-1604; miR-200c; ZEB

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFA0101300]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371510, 31571519, 31471250, 81530042, 31210103905, 31571529, 31571390]
  3. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [15JC1403201]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2000219136, 1500219106]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Clarifying the regulatory mechanisms of embryonic stem cell (ESC) neural differentiation is helpful not only for understanding neural development but also for obtaining high-quality neural progenitor cells required by stem cell therapy of neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we found that long noncoding RNA 1604 (lncRNA-1604) was highly expressed in cytoplasm during neural differentiation, and knockdown of lncRNA-1604 significantly repressed neural differentiation of mouse ESCs both in vitro and in vivo. Bioinformatics prediction and mechanistic analysis revealed that lncRNA-1604 functioned as a novel competing endogenous RNA of miR-200c and regulated the core transcription factors ZEB1 and ZEB2 during neural differentiation. Furthermore, we also demonstrated the critical role of miR-200c and ZEB1/2 in mouse neural differentiation. Either introduction of miR-200c sponge or overexpression of ZEB1/2 significantly reversed the lncRNA-1604 knockdown-induced repression of mouse ESC neural differentiation. Collectively, these findings not only identified a previously unknown role of lncRNA-1604 and ZEB1/2 but also elucidated a new regulatory lncRNA-1604/miR-200c/ZEB axis in neural differentiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available