4.7 Review

Concise Review: Kidney Generation with Human Pluripotent Stem Cells

Journal

STEM CELLS
Volume 35, Issue 11, Pages 2209-2217

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/stem.2699

Keywords

Pluripotent stem cell; Kidney; Organoid; Nephron; Regenerative medicine; Differentiation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R37-DK039773, R01-DK072381]
  2. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  3. ReproCELL
  4. Brigham and Women's Hospital
  5. Harvard Stem Cell Institute
  6. AJINOMOTO Co., Inc.
  7. Toray Industries, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a worldwide health care problem, resulting in increased cardiovascular mortality and often leading to end-stage kidney disease, where patients require kidney replacement therapies such as hemodialysis or kidney transplantation. Loss of functional nephrons contributes to the progression of CKD, which can be attenuated but not reversed due to inability to generate new nephrons in human adult kidneys. Human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs), by virtue of their unlimited self-renewal and ability to differentiate into cells of all three embryonic germ layers, are attractive sources for kidney regenerative therapies. Recent advances in stem cell biology have identified key signals necessary to maintain stemness of human nephron progenitor cells (NPCs) in vitro, and led to establishment of protocols to generate NPCs and nephron epithelial cells from human fetal kidneys and hPSCs. Effective production of large amounts of human NPCs and kidney organoids will facilitate elucidation of developmental and pathobiological pathways, kidney disease modeling and drug screening as well as kidney regenerative therapies. We summarize the recent studies to induce NPCs and kidney cells from hPSCs, studies of NPC expansion from mouse and human embryonic kidneys, and discuss possible approaches in vivo to regenerate kidneys with cell therapies and the development of bioengineered kidneys.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available