4.3 Article

High-Content Assessment of Cardiac Function Using Heart-on-a-Chip Devices as Drug Screening Model

Journal

STEM CELL REVIEWS AND REPORTS
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 335-346

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12015-017-9736-2

Keywords

Drug screening; Heart-on-a-chip; Organ-on-a-chip; Cardiotoxicity; Kinase

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CHIR) [MOP-126027, MOP-137107]
  3. NSERC Discovery [RGPIN 326982-10]
  4. NSERC-M3 Program
  5. Queen Elizabeth II Graduate Scholarships in Science Technology
  6. McLean Award
  7. Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarships-Doctoral Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Drug discovery and development continues to be a challenge to the pharmaceutical industry despite great advances in cell and molecular biology that allow for the design of better targeted therapeutics. Many potential drug compounds fail during the clinical trial due to inefficacy and toxicity that were not predicted during preclinical stages. The fundamental problem lies with the use of traditional drug screening models that still largely rely on the use of cell lines or animal cell monolayers, which leads to lack of predictive power of human tissue and organ response to the drug candidates. More physiologically relevant systems are therefore critical in relieving the burden of high failure rates. Emerging knowledge and techniques in tissue engineering and microfabrication have enabled the development of micro-engineered systems - collectively known as organs-on-chips - that may lead to a paradigm shift in preclinical drug screening assays. In this review we explore the technological advances and challenges in the development of heart-on-a-chip models, by addressing current assessment methods for drug-induced cardiotoxicity and providing a perspective on the modifications that should be implemented to realize the full potential of this system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available