4.5 Article

School readiness in the Midwest Child-Parent Center Expansion: A propensity score analysis of year 1 impacts

Journal

CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW
Volume 79, Issue -, Pages 620-630

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.042

Keywords

Human capital; School readiness; Impact evaluation; Preschool; Scale up

Funding

  1. US Department of Education's Investing in Innovation Fund
  2. J. B. and M. K. Pritzker Family Foundation
  3. McCormick Foundation
  4. Boeing Corp
  5. Evanston Community Foundation
  6. Finnegan Family Foundation
  7. Lewis Sebring Family Foundation
  8. Foundation65
  9. Northwestern University
  10. Elizabeth Beidler Tisdahl Foundation
  11. Target Corp
  12. W. K. Kellogg Foundation
  13. Doris Duke Charitable Trust
  14. Foundation for Child Development
  15. McKnight Foundation
  16. Greater Twin Cities United Way
  17. St Paul Foundation
  18. Minneapolis Foundation
  19. Joyce Foundation [U411B110098]
  20. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [R01HD034294]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, we evaluate the effectiveness of the first year of a federally-funded, evidence-based preschool through third grade intervention in Chicago. We use inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment to estimate the impacts of the Child-Parent Center (CPC) program on teacher assessments of school readiness for 1289 low-income preschool and 591 comparison-group participants. Results indicated significant positive impacts of the program for all domains, including literacy, math, socio-emotional development, science and total score. The percentage of CPC children who met national norms in school readiness exceeded the comparison group by 12 to 18.5 percentage points. Full-day participants experienced greater school readiness gains while program impacts were similar by family income and home language. Compared to the original CPC evaluation of children born in 1980 in which few comparison group children attended preschool, we find evidence that the contemporary implementation performs at least as well even though the current comparison group participants had alternative preschool experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available