4.5 Article

Comparison of epidemiologically linked Campylobacter jejuni isolated from human and poultry sources

Journal

EPIDEMIOLOGY AND INFECTION
Volume 143, Issue 16, Pages 3498-3509

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0950268815000886

Keywords

Campylobacter; clinical microbiology; poultry

Funding

  1. CSIRO
  2. National Board of Technical and Vocational Education, Libya/Department of Laboratory Medicine Derna, Libya [2008-628-1491]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Campylobacter jejuni is responsible for most foodborne bacterial infections worldwide including Australia. The aim of this study was to investigate a combination of typing methods in the characterization of C. jejuni isolated from clinical diarrhoeal samples (n = 20) and chicken meat (n = 26) in order to identify the source of infection and rank isolates based on their relative risk to humans. Sequencing of the flaA short variable region demonstrated that 86% of clinical isolates had genotypes that were also found in chicken meat. A polymerase chain reaction binary typing system identified 27 different codes based on the presence or absence of genes that have been reported to be associated with various aspects of C. jejuni pathogenicity, indicating that not all isolates may be of equal risk to human health. The lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of the C. jejuni isolates was classified into six classes (A, B, C, E, F, H) with 10.4% remaining unclassified. The majority (72.7%) of clinical isolates possessed sialylated LOS classes. Sialylated LOS classes were also detected in chicken isolates (80.7%). Antimicrobial tests indicated a low level of resistance, with no phenotypic resistance found to most antibiotics tested. A combination of typing approaches was useful to assign isolates to a source of infection and assess their risk to humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available