4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Explaining electricity demand and the role of energy and investment literacy on end-use efficiency of Swiss households

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 89-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2017.12.004

Keywords

Stochastic frontier analysis; Transient and persistent efficiency; Residential electricity demand; Energy literacy; Investment literacy

Categories

Funding

  1. Bundesamt fur Energie (BFE)
  2. Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper estimates the level of transient and persistent efficiency in the use of electricity in Swiss households using the newly developed generalized true random effects model (GTREM). An unbalanced panel dataset of 1994 Swiss households from 2010 to 2014 collected via a household survey is used to estimate an electricity demand frontier function. We further investigate whether energy and investment literacy have an influence on the household electricity consumption. The results show significant inefficiencies in the use of electricity among Swiss households, both transient (11%) and persistent (22%). We note that the high persistent inefficiency is indicative of structural problems faced by households and systematic behavioral shortcomings in residential electricity consumption. These results indicate a considerable potential for electricity savings and thus reaching the reduction targets defined by the Swiss federal council as part of the Energy Strategy 2050, wherein end-use efficiency improvement is one of the main pillars. The results support a positive role of energy and, in particular, investment literacy in reducing household electricity consumption. Policies targeting an improvement of these attributes could help to enhance efficiency in the use of energy within households. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available