4.7 Article

Impact of front-side point contact/passivation geometry on thin-film solar cell performance

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS
Volume 165, Issue -, Pages 94-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.02.031

Keywords

Thin film CIGS solar cells; Surface passivation; Point contact; Numerical simulations; Buffer layer; Grain-Boundary

Funding

  1. European Union [641004]
  2. Swiss State Secretariat for Education, Research and Innovation (SERI) [REF-1131-52107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we perform an extensive campaign of three-dimensional numerical simulations of CIGS solar cell structures to investigate the effect of a surface-passivated CIGS with point contacts openings on the cell performance parameters (J(sc), V-oc, FF and eta). Detailed analysis of the combination of passivation thickness, point contact size and pitch is performed under the hypothesis of highly defective CIGS front surface and ideal chemical passivation: efficiencies close to the case of ideal (i.e., defect-free) CdS/CIGS interface can be achieved by optimized nanometer-scale point contact arrays. To account for field-effect passivation due to positive residual charge density, Q(f) within the passivation layer, we vary Q(f) in the range 1010-1013 cm(-2) under the two extreme scenarios of ideal or ineffective chemical passivation. Several examples of CIGS cells with different buffer layers (CdS, ZnO, ZnMgO, In2S3, Zn(O, S)) are also analyzed. We find that a positive Q(f) in the interval 1012 -5.10(12) cm(-2) can help completely recover the ideal cell efficiency, irrespective of the chemical passivation effect and even in the presence of unfavorable conduction band alignment at the buffer/CIGS heterojunction. This may help devising solutions with buffer materials alternative to CdS, boosting the performance of otherwise surface-limited cells. The effect of grain boundary defect density and position with respect to point contacts is also addressed, with a grain dimension of 750 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available