4.6 Article

Full printable perovskite solar cells based on mesoscopic TiO2/Al2O3/NiO (carbon nanotubes) architecture

Journal

SOLAR ENERGY
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 158-165

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.019

Keywords

Perovskite; NiO; Carbon nanotubes; Charge transfer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program [2014CB643506, 2013CB922104]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201506165038]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673091, 5161101140]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province [ZRZ2015000203]
  5. Technology Creative Project of Excellent Middle & Young Team of Hubei Province [T201511]
  6. Wuhan National High Magnetic Field Center [2015KF18]
  7. Director Fund of the WNLO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this research work, for the first time, we introduced thin composite films (similar to 4.8 gm) made with NiO nanoparticles and single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) as alternatives to replace the commonly used carbon black/graphite counter electrode in full printable organic hole-transport layer free meso-porous perovskite solar cells. Due to the relative thick carbon black/graphite counter electrodes, which are typically 10 mu m thick, charge collection and batch to batch reproducibility of this type devices are significantly limited. We find an appreciated power conversion efficiency of 12.7% can be achieved for the CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell using mesoscopic TiO2/Al2O3 framework structure in combination with a thin NiO/SWCNT counter electrode under standard reporting conditions. Electronic impedance spectroscopy measurements reveal efficient charge collection ability for perovskite devices using thin NiO/SWCNT counter electrodes compared to the conventional carbon black/graphite counter electrode, and thus can efficiently deliver photocurrent. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available