4.7 Article

The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter: Fourteen years on

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 105, Issue -, Pages A3-A8

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.08.011

Keywords

Litter; Microbial residues; Subsoil; NMR spectroscopy; Rhizosphere; Root litter; OM turnover; Molecular composition

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

My 2002 SBB paper, The macromolecular organic composition of plant and microbial residues as inputs to soil organic matter, brought together knowledge on the chemical composition of the diverse inputs to soil organic matter. Both plant and microbial residues were examined with the analysis of their composition using a combination of different techniques. From this, the limitations of conventional proximate analysis methods were identified and the great potential of recent techniques, in particular solid-state C-13 NMR spectroscopy and molecular level analysis, for the overall characterization of the input materials were discussed. The paper emphasised the importance of differentiating between organic matter from plants (above-ground litter, root litter and rhizodeposition), microbial residues and extracellular polymers and their breakdown products as well as the need for quantitative measurements of the amounts of these materials entering soils. In the last 14 years much new knowledge has been generated regarding these inputs and their alteration during decomposition, yet we still lack quantitative data for the amounts, composition and transformations of the many different forms of organic matter entering the soil. This is particularly the case regarding the inputs to the subsoil via root litter and rhizodeposition and the significance of microbial residues and extracellular polymers and their turnover. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available