4.7 Article

Quantifying in situ and modeling net nitrogen mineralization from soil organic matter in arable cropping systems

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages 44-59

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.03.010

Keywords

Modeling; Nitrogen mineralization; Soil organic matter; Field experimental dataset; LIXIM model; Cropping history

Categories

Funding

  1. ARVALIS
  2. CETIOM (Terres Inovia)
  3. INRA
  4. French Government [ANR-001-01]
  5. Genesys WP1 P13 Solebiom project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Improved assessment and prediction of net nitrogen mineralization (NNM) from soil organic matter in field conditions are essential for a better management of nitrogen (N) in arable cropping systems and an accurate simulation of its seasonal dynamics. The first objective of this study was to quantify accurately NNM rates by combining measurements of soil water and mineral N contents in soil profile, daily weather data and the LIXIM calculation model (Mary et al., 1999). The second objective was to develop a predictive model of in situ NNM rates based on basic soil properties and to evaluate if additional factors related to cropping history, organic matter fractions or microbial biomass could improve the model performance. We selected a set of 65 field experiments representative of arable cropping systems in France which were carried out in bare fallow soils without recent addition of crop residue (minimal delay of 4 months) or organic amendment. In these experiments, soil water and mineral N contents were monitored over the soil profile (0-90 to 0-150 cm depth, 3 to 5 layers) during 100-555 days (median value of 272 days). LIXIM was able to satisfactorily simulate water (EF = 0.58) and mineral N contents (EF = 0.80) in the several layers, allowing to disentangle the two main processes involved in mineral N changes: NNM (occurring in the upper soil layer) and nitrate transfer (through the whole soil profile). The actual NNM rates varied widely between sites from 0.13 to 1.10 kg N ha(-1) day(-1). The potential NNM rates (Vp), calculated under standard conditions of water and temperature, varied between 0.17 and 1.67 kg N ha(-1) nday(-1) (nday = normalized day at 15 degrees C and field capacity). A novel model with a multiplicative structure and a sequential approach was developed by including functions explaining the relationship between mineralization rate Vp (predicted variable) and explanatory variables. Soil organic N (SON) was the most correlated variable with Vp (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) and the first variable introduced in the model as a linear function. Non-linear functions of soil clay content, pH, C/N ratio and CaCO3 content were successively introduced, leading to a soil model based on five basic soil parameters that allowed explaining 61% of the variance in Vp. Two functions relative to the frequency of rapeseed and legumes in rotations were found to further improve the predictive quality of the soil model, explaining finally 72% of Vp variance (soil-history model). Organic matter fractions (particulate or extractible organic matter) did not explain significantly more variance of Vp due to their strong correlations with SON. Microbial biomass explained only 2% additional variance in Vp compared to the soil-history model. The predictive error of prediction (RMSEP) varied between 0.22, 0.19 and 0.17 kg N ha(-1) nday(-1) for the soil (n = 65), soil-history (n = 65) and soil-history-biological (n = 47) models. This multiplicative, non-linear approach performed better than a multiple linear regression approach which explained 10-15% less variance of Vp when using the same explanatory variables. The models based on soil properties and cropping history could be further implemented in multi-disciplinary soil-crop models and decision support systems in order to enhance the prediction of N dynamics in soils and improve fertilizer recommendations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available