4.6 Article

Revisiting the generalized scaling law for adhesion: role of compliance and extension to progressive failure

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 13, Issue 41, Pages 7529-7536

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7sm01098b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Provost's Office
  2. NSF CAREER [CMMI-1454153]
  3. Provost's College of Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn
  5. Directorate For Engineering [1454153] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A generalized scaling law, based on the classical fracture mechanics approach, is developed to predict the bond strength of adhesive systems. The proposed scaling relationship depends on the rate of change of debond area with compliance, rather than the ratio of area to compliance. This distinction can have a profound impact on the expected bond strength of systems, particularly when the failure mechanism changes or the compliance of the load train increases. Based on the classical fracture mechanics approach for rate-independent materials, the load train compliance should not affect the force capacity of the adhesive system, whereas when the area to compliance ratio is used as the scaling parameter, it directly influences the bond strength, making it necessary to distinguish compliance contributions. To verify the scaling relationship, single lap shear tests were performed for a given pressure sensitive adhesive (PSA) tape specimens with different bond areas, number of backing layers, and load train compliance. The shear lag model was used to derive closed-form relationships for the system compliance and its derivative with respect to the debond area. Digital image correlation (DIC) is implemented to verify the non-uniform shear stress distribution obtained from the shear lag model in a lap shear geometry. The results obtained from this approach could lead to a better understanding of the relationship between bond strength and the geometry and mechanical properties of adhesive systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available