4.6 Article

Toxicological effects of short-term dietary acrylamide exposure in male F344 rats

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 85-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2014.11.009

Keywords

Acrylamide; Clinical biochemistry; Diet; F344 rats; Hematology; Testosterone

Funding

  1. Chemicals Management Plan, Government of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We recently reported that acrylamide, a known rodent and probable human carcinogen, does not increase the risk of azoxymethane (AOM)-induced rat colon precancerous lesions when administered through the diet. Here, we present toxicological data from non-AOM-injected rats. Briefly, male F344 rats were randomized into four dietary groups and received experimental diets based on AIN-93G formulation and containing acrylamide at 0 (control), 5, 10 or 50 mg/kg diet (wt/wt) ad libitum for 10 weeks, after which they were killed and their blood collected for hematological and biochemical markers. Acrylamide at the higher doses (10 and 50 mg/kg diet) significantly lowered (p < 0.05) serum total high density lipoprotein and total testosterone and increased serum lipase in comparison to the control. Blood hematocrit values and lymphocyte counts were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the high dose acrylamide (50 mg/kg diet) group compared to control, with a concomitant decrease in hemoglobin level, mean corpuscular volume and mean corpuscular hemoglobin. These results provide additional hazard characterization data and strengthen the notion that at high doses, acrylamide may involve systemic toxicity potentiating tumorigenesis in experimental animals. Further studies are required to understand the health effects of food-borne acrylamide, especially at the lower exposures typified by human diets. Crown Copyright (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available