4.5 Article

Textile dyes induce toxicity on zebrafish early life stages

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 429-434

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3202

Keywords

Aquatic toxicity; Textile dye; Embryo-larval toxicity test; Malformation; Alternative to animal testing

Funding

  1. Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences at Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Unit of Experimental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology, Barcelona Science Park
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo/SP, Brazil [2013/01509-4, 2013/01735-4]
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [13/01735-4, 13/01509-4] Funding Source: FAPESP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Textile manufacturing is one of the most polluting industrial sectors because of the release of potentially toxic compounds, such as synthetic dyes, into the environment. Depending on the class of the dyes, their loss in wastewaters can range from 2% to 50% of the original dye concentration. Consequently, uncontrolled use of such dyes can negatively affect human health and the ecological balance. The present study assessed the toxicity of the textile dyes Direct Black 38 (DB38), Reactive Blue 15 (RB15), Reactive Orange 16 (RO16), and Vat Green 3 (VG3) using zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos for 144h postfertilization (hpf). At the tested conditions, none of the dyes caused significant mortality. The highest RO16 dose significantly delayed or inhibited the ability of zebrafish embryos to hatch from the chorion after 96 hpf. From 120 hpf to 144 hpf, all the dyes impaired the gas bladder inflation of zebrafish larvae, DB38 also induced curved tail, and VG3 led to yolk sac edema in zebrafish larvae. Based on these data, DB38, RB15, RO16, and VG3 can induce malformations during embryonic and larval development of zebrafish. Therefore, it is essential to remove these compounds from wastewater or reduce their concentrations to safe levels before discharging textile industry effluents into the aquatic environment. Environ Toxicol Chem 2016;35:429-434. (c) 2015 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available