4.8 Article

High Relaxivity Gadolinium-Polydopamine Nanoparticles

Journal

SMALL
Volume 13, Issue 43, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smll.201701830

Keywords

antiferromagnetic coupling; contrast agent; magnetometry; MRI; polydopamine

Funding

  1. AFOSR [FA9550-11-1-0105]
  2. Compagnia di San Paolo (CSP NANOPROGLY Project)
  3. State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering, Sichuan University [sklpme2016-3-03]
  4. Soft and Hybrid Nanotechnology Experimental (SHyNE) Resource [NSF ECCS-1542205]
  5. MRSEC program at the Materials Research Center [NSF DMR-1121262]
  6. International Institute for Nanotechnology (IIN)
  7. Keck Foundation
  8. State of Illinois, through the IIN
  9. FISP award [C6007]
  10. Air Force Offfice of Scientific Research (AFOSR) [FA9550-15-1-0273]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports the preparation of a series of gadolinium-polydopamine nanoparticles (GdPD-NPs) with tunable metal loadings. GdPD-NPs are analyzed by nuclear magnetic relaxation dispersion and with a 7-tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner. A relaxivity of 75 and 10.3 mM(-1) s(-1) at 1.4 and 7 T is observed, respectively. Furthermore, superconducting quantum interference device magnetometry is used to study intraparticle magnetic interactions and determine the GdPD-NPs consist of isolated metal ions even at maximum metal loadings. From these data, it is concluded that the observed high relaxivities arise from a high hydration state of the Gd(III) at the particle surface, fast rate of water exchange, and negligible antiferromagnetic coupling between Gd(III) centers throughout the particles. This study highlights design parameters and a robust synthetic approach that aid in the development of this scaffold for T1-weighted, high relaxivity MRI contrast agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available