4.5 Article

Endocrine-disrupting effect of the ultraviolet filter benzophenone-3 in zebrafish, Danio rerio

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY
Volume 34, Issue 12, Pages 2833-2840

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/etc.3129

Keywords

Endocrine disruptors; UV filters; Vitellogenin; Sex ratio; Aquatic toxicology

Funding

  1. Danish Environmental Protection Agency via the Danish Centre on Endocrine Disrupters [MST-621-0116]
  2. Danish Natural Science Research Council [09-062337]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The chemical ultraviolet (UV) filter benzophenone-3 (BP-3) is suspected to be an endocrine disruptor based on results from in vitro and in vivo testing. However, studies including endpoints of endocrine adversity are lacking. The present study investigated the potential endocrine-disrupting effects of BP-3 in zebrafish (Danio rerio) in the Fish Sexual Development Test (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development TG 234) and a 12-d adult male zebrafish study. In TG 234, exposure from 0 d to 60 d posthatch caused a monotone dose-dependent skewing of the phenotypic sex ratio toward fewer males and more female zebrafish (no observed effect concentration [NOEC]: 191g/L, lowest observed effect concentration [LOEC]: 388g/L). Besides, gonad maturation was affected in both female fish (NOEC 191g/L, LOEC 388g/L) and male fish (NOEC 388g/L, LOEC 470g/L). Exposure to BP-3 did not affect the vitellogenin concentration in TG 234. After 12 d exposure of adult male zebrafish, a slight yet significant increase in the vitellogenin concentration was observed at 268g/L but not at 63g/L and 437g/L BP-3. Skewing of the sex ratio is a marker of an endocrine-mediated mechanism as well as a marker of adversity, and therefore the conclusion of the present study is that BP-3 is an endocrine-disrupting chemical in accordance with the World Health Organization's definition. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:2833-2840. (c) 2015 SETAC

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available