4.6 Article

DPRS: A dynamic popularity aware replication strategy with parallel download scheme in cloud environments

Journal

SIMULATION MODELLING PRACTICE AND THEORY
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages 177-196

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.simpat.2017.06.001

Keywords

Data replication; Parallel download; Cloud computing; Simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cloud computing has emerged as a main approach for managing huge distributed data in different areas such as scientific operations and engineering experiments. In this regard, data replication in Cloud environments is a key strategy that reduces response time and improves reliability. One of the main features of a distributed environment is to replicate data in various sites such that popular data would be more available. Whenever a site does not have a needed data file, it will have to fetch it from other locations. Therefore, the parallel download approach is applied to reduce download time. It enables a user to get various parts of a file from several sites simultaneously. In this work, we present a data replication strategy, named the Dynamic Popularity aware Replication Strategy (DPRS), which is presented on Cloud system leveraging data access behavior. DPRS replicates only a small amount of frequently requested data file based on 80/20 idea. It determines to which site the file is replicated based on number of requests, free storage space, and site centrality. We introduce a parallel downloading approach that replicates data segments and parallel downloads replicated data fragments, to enhance the overall performance. We evaluate effective network usage, mean job execution time, hit ratio, total number of replications and percentage of storage filled by using the CloudSim simulator. Extensive experimentations demonstrate the effectiveness of DPRS under most of access patterns. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available