3.8 Proceedings Paper

kNN Sampling for Personalised Human Activity Recognition

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER INTERNATIONAL PUBLISHING AG
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_23

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. collaborative project SELFBACK under the European Commission [689043]
  2. H2020 Societal Challenges Programme [689043] Funding Source: H2020 Societal Challenges Programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The need to adhere to recommended physical activity guidelines for a variety of chronic disorders calls for high precision Human Activity Recognition (HAR) systems. In the SELFBACK system, HAR is used to monitor activity types and intensities to enable self-management of low back pain (LBP). HAR is typically modelled as a classification task where sensor data associated with activity labels are used to train a classifier to predict future occurrences of those activities. An important consideration in HAR is whether to use training data from a general population (subject-independent), or personalised training data from the target user (subject-dependent). Previous evaluations have shown that using personalised data results in more accurate predictions. However, from a practical perspective, collecting sufficient training data from the end user may not be feasible. This has made using subject-independent data by far the more common approach in commercial HAR systems. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach which uses nearest neighbour similarity to identify examples from a subject-independent training set that are most similar to sample data obtained from the target user and uses these examples to generate a personalised model for the user. This nearest neighbour sampling approach enables us to avoid much of the practical limitations associated with training a classifier exclusively with user data, while still achieving the benefit of personalisation. Evaluations show our approach to significantly out perform a general subject-independent model by up to 5%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available