4.6 Article

COMPLEXITY AND APPROXIMATION OF THE CONTINUOUS NETWORK DESIGN PROBLEM

Journal

SIAM JOURNAL ON OPTIMIZATION
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages 1554-1582

Publisher

SIAM PUBLICATIONS
DOI: 10.1137/15M1016461

Keywords

bilevel optimization; optimization under equilibrium constraints; network design; Wardrop equilibrium; computational complexity; approximation algorithms

Funding

  1. Einstein Foundation Berlin [B-M15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We revisit a classical problem in transportation, known as the (bilevel) continuous network design problem, CNDP for short. Given a graph for which the latency of each edge depends on the ratio of the edge flow and the capacity installed, the goal is to find an optimal investment in edge capacities so as to minimize the sum of the routing costs of the induced Wardrop equilibrium and the investment costs for installing the edge's capacities. While this problem is considered to be challenging in the literature, its complexity status was still unknown. We close this gap, showing that CNDP is strongly NP-hard and A PX-hard, both on directed and undirected networks and even for instances with affine latencies. As for the approximation of the problem, we first provide a detailed analysis for a heuristic studied by Marcotte for the special case of monomial latency functions [P. Marcotte, Math. Prog., 34 (1986), pp. 142{162]. We derive a closed form expression of its approximation guarantee for arbitrary sets of latency functions. We then propose a different approximation algorithm and show that it has the same approximation guarantee. Then, we prove that using the better of the two approximation algorithms results in a strictly improved approximation guarantee for which we derive a closed form expression. For affine latencies, for example, this best-of-two approach achieves an approximation factor of 49/41 approximate to 1 : 195, which improves on the factor of 5/4 that has been shown before by Marcotte.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available