3.8 Proceedings Paper

Review and Future Research Directions about Major Monitoring Method of Soil Erosion

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/63/1/012042

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFC0502300, 2016YFC0502102, 2014BAB03B00]
  2. National Key Research and Development [2014BAB03B02]
  3. Agricultural Science and Technology Key Project of Guizhou Province of China [2014-3039]
  4. Science and Technology Plan Projects of Guiyang Municipal Bureau of Science and Technology of China [2012-205]
  5. Science and Technology Plan of Guizhou Province of China [2012-6015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil erosion is a highly serious ecological problem that occurs worldwide. Hence, scientific methods for accurate monitoring are needed to obtain soil erosion data. At present, numerous methods on soil erosion monitoring are being used internationally. In this paper, we present a systematic classification of these methods based on the date of establishment and type of approach. This classification comprises five categories: runoff plot method, erosion pin method, radionuclide tracer method, model estimation, and 3S technology combined method. The backgrounds of their establishment are briefly introduced, the history of their development is reviewed, and the conditions for their application are enumerated. Their respective advantages and disadvantages are compared and analysed, and future prospects regarding their development are discussed. We conclude that the methods of soil erosion monitoring in the past 100 years of their development constantly considered the needs of the time. According to the progress of soil erosion monitoring technology throughout its history, we predict that the future trend in this field would move toward the development of quantitative, precise, and composite methods. This report serves as a valuable reference for scientific and technological workers globally, especially those engaged in soil erosion research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available