4.4 Article

A comparison of six different ballast water treatment systems based on UV radiation, electrochlorination and chlorine dioxide

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
Volume 36, Issue 16, Pages 2094-2104

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1021858

Keywords

ballast water treatment; chlorine dioxide; electrochlorination; UV radiation; phytoplankton

Funding

  1. North Sea Region Programme under the ERDF of the European Union

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The spread of aquatic invasive species through ballast water is a major ecological and economical threat. Because of this, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) set limits to the concentrations of organisms allowed in ballast water. To meet these limits, ballast water treatment systems (BWTSs) were developed. The main techniques used for ballast water treatment are ultraviolet (UV) radiation and electrochlorination (EC). In this study, phytoplankton regrowth after treatment was followed for six BWTSs. Natural plankton communities were treated and incubated for 20 days. Growth, photosystem II efficiency and species composition were followed. The three UV systems all showed similar patterns of decrease in phytoplankton concentrations followed by regrowth. The two EC and the chlorine dioxide systems showed comparable results. However, UV- and chlorine-based treatment systems showed significantly different responses. Overall, all BWTSs reduced phytoplankton concentrations to below the IMO limits, which represents a reduced risk of aquatic invasions through ballast water.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available