4.7 Article

An evaluation of hydroxamate collectors for malachite flotation

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 258-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.02.056

Keywords

Hydroxamates; Malachite; Flotation; Surface chemistry; Zeta potential

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  2. Avalon Rare Metals [RGPIN-2014-06230]
  3. NSERC Canada
  4. McGill Engineering Doctoral Award
  5. NSERC Alexander Graham Bell Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Copper oxide minerals, such as malachite, do not often respond well to traditional copper sulphide collectors, and require alternative flotation schemes. Hydroxamic acid collectors have been suggested as a means to directly float malachite; however, there is limited information on the effect of reagent structure on the performance of these collectors. This paper investigated the effect of five alkyl hydroxamates and two aromatic hydroxamates on the flotation of a synthetic ore composed of pure, fully liberated, malachite and quartz. Zeta potential measurements were used to aid in understanding reagent adsorption onto the surface of the two minerals. The collectors were then evaluated using bench scale flotation results. While zeta potential measurements suggested that all the collectors investigated selectively adsorb onto the surface of malachite, only benzohydroxamic acid and C-8 alkyl hydroxamates were effective collectors in the flotation of malachite. Benzohydroxamic acid was the most selective; however, significantly lower dosages of C-8 alkyl hydroxamates were required to obtain similar malachite recoveries, with minimal increases in quartz recovery. Benzo- and octylhydroxamic acid were further examined for the flotation of fine (-38 mu m) particles. For fine particle flotation experiments the effect of temperature was also investigated as a means to improve the flotation performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available