4.7 Article

Functionalization of silver nanoparticles with glutamine and histidine for simple and selective detection of Hg2+ ion in water samples

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 244, Issue -, Pages 972-982

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2017.01.041

Keywords

Gln-His-Ag NPs; Hg2+ ion; TEM; UV-vis spectrometry and water samples

Funding

  1. Department of science and technology, India (DST Fast Track Scheme) [SR/FTP/ES-16/2011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A simple, rapid and sensitive colorimetric method was developed for the detection of Hg2+ ion in water samples using glutamine (Gin) and histidine (His) functionalized silver nanoparticles (Gln-His-Ag NPs) as a probe. The functionalized Ag NPs were confirmed by IJV-vis, FT-1R and transmission electron microscopic (TEM) techniques, respectively. The Hg2+ ion was induced quickly the aggregation of Gln-His-Ag NPs, yielding a color change from yellow to orange, which can be readily seen by naked eye. The recognition mechanism is attributed to unique supramolecular nanostructures of Gln-His-Ag NPs, which yields strong interaction (cooperative metal-ligand interaction) between Gln-His-Ag NPs and Hg2+ ion. A linear correlation was obtained in the range of 100-1000 mu M with a detection limit of 25.48 mu M. However, the sensitivity of the probe was greatly improved by the addition of 0.2 M NaC1 as an ionic strength. The calibration graph was constructed between absorption ratio (A(500)/A(402)) and concentration of Hg2+ ion in the range of 1.0-500 mu M with the detection limit of 0.90 mu M, which is 28-times lower than the direct method (without NaCI). This method was successfully applied to detect Hg2+ ion in water samples. With the advantages of simplicity, selectivity and low sample volume, this method can potentially suitable for on-site monitoring of Hg2+ ion. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available