3.8 Proceedings Paper

Tensor Rank Estimation and Completion via CP-based Nuclear Norm

Publisher

ASSOC COMPUTING MACHINERY
DOI: 10.1145/3132847.3132945

Keywords

Tensor Rank Estimation; CP-based Tensor Nuclear Norm; CP Decomposition; Tensor Completion

Funding

  1. NSFC [61672444, 61272366]
  2. HKBU Faculty Research [FRG2/16-17/051]
  3. HKBU KTO grant [MPCF-004-2017/18]
  4. SZSTI [JCYJ20160531194006833]
  5. Hong Kong PhD Fellowship Scheme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tensor completion (TC) is a challenging problem of recovering missing entries of a tensor from its partial observation. One main TC approach is based on CP/Tucker decomposition. However, this approach often requires the determination of a tensor rank a priori. This rank estimation problem is difficult in practice. Several Bayesian solutions have been proposed but they often under/overestimate the tensor rank while being quite slow. To address this problem of rank estimation with missing entries, we view the weight vector of the orthogonal CP decomposition of a tensor to be analogous to the vector of singular values of a matrix. Subsequently, we define a new CP-based tensor nuclear norm as the Li-norm of this weight vector. We then propose Tensor Rank Estimation based on Li-regularized orthogonal CP decomposition (TREL1) for both CP-rank and Tucker-rank. Specifically, we incorporate a regularization with CP-based tensor nuclear norm when minimizing the reconstruction error in TC to automatically determine the rank of an incomplete tensor. Experimental results on both synthetic and real data show that: 1) Given sufficient observed entries, TREL1 can estimate the true rank (both CP-rank and Tucker-rank) of incomplete tensors well; 2) The rank estimated by TREL1 can consistently improve recovery accuracy of decomposition-based TC methods; 3) TREL1 is not sensitive to its parameters in general and more efficient than existing rank estimation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available