3.8 Article

Reversing Frailty Levels in Primary Care Using the CARES Model

Journal

CANADIAN GERIATRICS JOURNAL
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 105-111

Publisher

MULTIMED INC
DOI: 10.5770/cgj.20.274

Keywords

frailty; comprehensive geriatric assessment; frailty index; clinical frailty scale; Community Actions and Resources Empowering Seniors (CARES)

Funding

  1. Canadian Foundation for Healthcare improvements EXTRA program
  2. Fountain Family Innovation Fund
  3. Fraser Health Authority
  4. philanthropic award via the QEII Health Sciences Center Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The purpose of this manuscript was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Community Actions and Resources Empowering Seniors (CARES) model in measuring and mitigating frailty among community-dwelling older adults. Methods The CARES model is based on a goal-oriented multidisciplinary primary care plan which combines a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) with health coaching. A total of 51 older adults (82 +/- 7 years; 33 females) participated in the pilot phase of this initiative. Frailty was measured using the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and the Frailty Index (FI-CGA) at baseline and at six-month follow-up. Results The FI-CGA at follow-up (0.21 +/- 0.08) was significantly lower than the FI-CGA at baseline (0.24 +/- 0.08), suggesting an average reduction of 1.8 deficits. Sixty-one per cent of participants improved their FI-CGA and 38% improved CFS categories. Participants classified as vulnerable/frail at baseline were more responsive to the intervention compared to non-frail participants. Conclusion Pilot data showed that it is feasible to assess frailty in primary care and that the CARES intervention might have a positive effect on frailty, a promising finding that requires further investigations. General practitioners who participate in the CARES model can now access their patients' FI-CGA scores at point of service through their electronic medical records.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available