3.8 Article

Efficacy of corneal cooling on postoperative pain management after photorefractive keratectomy: A contralateral eye randomized clinical trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages 264-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.joco.2017.04.004

Keywords

Photorefractive keratectomy; PRK; Balanced salt solution; Bandage contact lens; Cooling; Pain

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To compare chilled and room temperature balanced salt solution (BSS) and bandage contact lens (BCL) on post photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) pain. Methods: In a prospective, single-masked, controlled eye study, one hundred eyes of fifty patients were divided into two groups which received room temperature or chilled BSS and BCL in each eye, and compared for post-PRK pain. Three different pain evaluation systems were used to evaluate pain between the groups at 1 and 6 h and days 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7, postoperatively. Results: 15 patients were male (30%), and 35 were female (70%). The mean age was 29 +/- 5 (20-40) y/o. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) of preoperative refractive error in both groups was not statistically significantly different (-4.18 +/- 1.5 in chilled and -4.19 +/- 1.7 in room-temperature groups, respectively; P = 0.94). The mean time of epithelial healing was 6.16 +/- 1.7 (3-13) days in the chilled and 6.10 +/- 1.59 (3-12) in the room temperature group (P = 0.32). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 1 month was 0.013 +/- 0.03 (0-0.22) logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in the chilled group and 0.014 +/- 0.04 (0-0.22) logMAR in the room temperature group, postoperatively (P = 0.84). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups by any of the three pain scoring systems. No clinically important corneal haziness was found in the groups during follow-up. Conclusion: Chilled BSS and BCL do not seem to be superior to room temperature in reducing post-PRK pain. Copyright (c) 2017, Iranian Society of Ophthalmology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available