4.7 Article

Speciation of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present during fog time collected submicron particles

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 22, Issue 16, Pages 12458-12468

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-015-4413-y

Keywords

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; Foggy days; PM1; Benzo(a)pyrene; Fluoranthene; Diagnostic ratio

Funding

  1. internal funds of IIT Kanpur

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Airborne submicron particles (PM1) were collected using PM1 sampler during the fog-dominated days (December 2013-January 2014). PM1 values varied between 58.12 mu g/m(3) and 198.75 mu g/m(3), and average mass concentration was 162.33 +/- 38.25 mu g/m(3) while total average concentration of particle-associated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAHs) determined was 616.31 +/- 30.31 ng/m(3). This is a signal for an alarming high pollution level at this site situated in the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP). PAHs were extracted from filters using toluene and acetonitrile. Quantitative measurements of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) were carried out using the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique. The extracts were analyzed for 16 target polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) including carcinogenic compound benzo(a) pyrene (19.86 +/- 38.98 ng/m(3)). Fluoranthene, benzo(a) anthracene, anthracene, and fluorene were the predominant compounds found in the samples collected during foggy days. Based on number of rings, four-ring PAH compounds had maximum contribution (43 %) in this fog time collected submicron particles followed by three-ring (21 %), five-ring (20 %), six-ring (13 %), and two-ring (3 %), respectively. In winter and foggy days, wood and coal combustion and biomass burning also significantly contribute to the PAH levels. However, diagnostic ratio suggests diesel emissions as the prime source of PAHs at this sampling site.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available