4.5 Review

Frailty and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review

Journal

ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 135-142

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.10.007

Keywords

Renal insufficiency; Chronic; Frail elderly

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Frailty is associated with increased vulnerability to poor health. There is growing interest in understanding the association between frailty and chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review explored how frailty is measured in patients with CKD and the association between frailty and adverse outcomes across different stages of renal impairment. Study design: Systematic analysis of peer reviewed articles. Data sources: Pubmed, Medline, Web of Science and Cochrane were used to identify the articles. Data synthesis: Articles published before the 17th of September 2016, that measured frailty in patients with CKD was eligible for the systematic review. Two independent researchers assessed the eligibility of the articles. Quality of the articles was assessed using the Epidemiological Appraisal Instrument. Results: The literature search yielded 540 articles, of which 32 met the study criteria and were included in the review (n = 36,076, age range: 50-83 years). Twenty-three (72%) studies used or adapted the Fried phenotype to measure frailty. The prevalence of frailty ranged from 7% in community-dwellers (CKD Stages 1-4) to 73% in a cohort of patients on haemodialysis. The incidence of frailty increased with reduced glomerular filtration rate. Frailty was associated with an increased risk of mortality and hospitalization. Conclusion: Frailty is prevalent in patients with CKD and it is associated with an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. There are differences in the methods used to assess frailty and this hinders comparisons between studies. Crown Copyright (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available