4.1 Article

Collaborative fashion consumption and its environmental effects

Journal

JOURNAL OF FASHION MARKETING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 468-482

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JFMM-09-2016-0086

Keywords

Collaborative consumption; Sharing economy; Fashion consumption; Second hand garments; Sustainable fashion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide the conceptual basis of collaborative fashion consumption (CFC) as a possible path toward more sustainable clothing. A definition and a typology of CFC are introduced and possible environmental effects of CFC are structured and discussed. This provides a solid conceptual basis for future empirical studies on CFC as an element of more sustainable consumption. Design/methodology/approach - This paper is written mainly based on a review of the more recent literature on collaborative consumption, as well as of older papers about related concepts like sustainable service systems and eco-efficient services. The proposed CFC typology and the structure of environmental effects are developed using both a deductive and an inductive process, and then by transferring existing structures to this specific field and challenging them by assigning practical examples. Findings - The main contributions of this paper are the definition and typology of CFC and the structure for assessing its environmental effects. Research limitations/implications - The findings provide a conceptual basis for future empirical research on CFC. Practical implications - For practitioners, the CFC typology and the structure of environmental effects could be used as checklists for future development of more sustainable collaborative consumption offers. Originality/value - This paper makes a unique contribution to the concept of CFC. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first paper that has been explicitly dedicated to examining different types and environmental effects of CFC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available