4.1 Article

Company stakeholder responsibility An empirical investigation of top managers' attitudinal change

Journal

BALTIC JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 114-138

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/BJM-07-2016-0148

Keywords

Finland; Change; Survey research; Corporate social responsibility; Managerial attitudes; Company stakeholder responsibility

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - Company stakeholder responsibility considers stakeholder engagement and management as key to long-term firm success. The purpose of this paper is to examine how top managers' stakeholder responsibility attitudes change and how they balance stakeholder responsibilities and economic interests. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conducted empirical research using the company stakeholder responsibility framework by conducting a repeated cross-sectional survey in Finland in 1994, 1999, 2004, 2009 and 2014. Findings - The study shows how development in the business context influences managers' attitudes towards stakeholder responsibility. Simultaneously with the expansion of free competition in 1990s Finland, managerial commitment to company stakeholder responsibility strengthened in Finnish industry. Research limitations/implications - The target group consisting of industrial managers both in a single-country context and the social desirability bias present in survey research may limit the generalisability of the results. Originality/value - The study contributes to the discussion of the role of situational factors in the development of corporate responsibility by showing that while economic changes have some influence on managerial attitudes, the expansion of free markets, together with increased regulation in certain areas, appears to influence managers' stakeholder responsibility attitudes to an even greater degree.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available