3.8 Article

Genetic Association of MMP10, MMP14, and MMP16 with Dental Caries

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY
Volume 2017, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2017/8465125

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [U01-DE018903, R01-DE014899, R01-DE009551, R01-DE012101, R01-DE018914, R03-DE024264, P50-DA005605, R01-DA019157]
  2. National Science Foundation/Department of Defense Grant [DBI-1263020]
  3. University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine
  4. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of Health Grant [ME-02-384]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), which degrade extracellular proteins as part of a variety of physiological processes, and their inhibitors have been implicated in the dental caries process. Here we investigated 28 genetic variants spanning the MMP10, MMP14, andMMP16 genes to detect association with dental caries experience in 13 age- and race-stratified (n = 3, 587) samples from 6 parent studies. Analyses were performed separately for each sample, and results were combined across samples by meta-analysis. Two SNPs (rs2046315 and rs10429371) upstream of MMP16 were significantly associated with caries in an individual sample of white adults and via meta-analysis across 8 adult samples after gene-wise adjustment for multiple comparisons. Noteworthy is SNP rs2046315 (p = 8.14 x 10(-8)) association with caries in white adults. This SNP was originally nominated in a genome-wide-association study (GWAS) of dental caries in a sample of white adults and yielded associations in a subsequent GWAS of surface level caries in white adults as well. Therefore, in our study, we were able to recapture the association between rs2046315 and dental caries in white adults. Although we did not strengthen evidence that MMPs 10, 14, and 16 influence caries risk, MMP16 is still a likely candidate gene to pursue.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available