4.5 Article

An integrated ecosystem service assessment in an artificial desert oasis of northwestern China

Journal

JOURNAL OF LAND USE SCIENCE
Volume 12, Issue 2-3, Pages 154-167

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1747423X.2017.1308024

Keywords

Ecosystem service indicators; integrated modeling methods; GIS; mapping; artificial desert oasis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601184]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (WUT) [2016IVA044]
  3. local government of Zhangye city

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Spatially explicit integrated assessment of ecosystem services is a new and important research field in landscape ecology. The objective of this paper was to develop an integrated process-based modeling method to simulate changes in multiple ecosystem services in 2000-2009 at pixel and regional scales in the Zhangye oasis of northwestern China. Six ecosystem service indicators were selected and quantified using process-based models, including net primary production (NPP), grain production, net oxygen production (NOP), carbon sequestration (CS), water conservation, and soil conservation. Analytical results were as follows: (1) At the oasis scale, NPP, NOP, CS, water conservation, and soil conservation decreased from 2000 to 2009, whereas grain production increased. (2) At the pixel scale, the spatial changes in NPP were similar to those in NOP and CS, but changes in grain production showed the opposite pattern. Water conservation and soil conservation showed somewhat unintuitive spatial patterns. (3) The impact of land-use forms on ecosystem services showed that grazing and township construction both had negative impacts on all services, but that nature conservation and wetland development had positive impacts on all services. This research showed that the integrated modeling can be proposed as an environmental decision-making tool in similar case studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available