4.3 Review

Assessing the Heritability of Complex Traits in Humans: Methodological Challenges and Opportunities

Journal

CURRENT GENOMICS
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 332-340

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389202918666170307161450

Keywords

Heritability; Complex traits; Twin studies; Family studies; Path analysis; Missing heritability

Funding

  1. Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Genetics of Obesity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this review article is to provide a conceptual based summary of how heritability estimates for complex traits such as obesity are determined and to explore the future directions of research in the heritability field. The target audience are researchers who use heritability data rather than those conducting heritability studies. The article provides an introduction to key concepts critical to understanding heritability studies including: i) definitions of heritability: broad sense versus narrow sense heritability; ii) how data for heritability studies are collected: twin, adoption, family and population-based studies; and iii) analytical techniques: path analysis, structural equations and mixed or regressive models of complex segregation analysis. For each section, a discussion of how the different definitions and methodologies influence heritability estimates is provided. The general limitations of heritability studies are discussed including the issue of missing heritability in which heritability estimates are significantly higher than the variance explained by known genetic variants. Potential causes of missing heritability include restriction of many genetic association studies to single nucleotide polymorphisms, gene by gene interactions, epigenetics, and gene by environment interactions. Innovative strategies of accounting for missing heritability including modeling techniques and improved software are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available