4.6 Article

Provenance of the Miocene Slovenj Gradec Basin sedimentary fill, Western Central Paratethys

Journal

SEDIMENTARY GEOLOGY
Volume 375, Issue -, Pages 256-267

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2017.11.002

Keywords

Pannonian Basin; Slovenj Gradec Basin; Sedimentology; Geochemistry; Petrography; Provenance

Categories

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) in the frame of the Young Researchers programme
  2. Ground waters and Geochemistry research programme [P1-0020]
  3. Mineral resources research programme [P1-0025]
  4. World Federation of Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Slovenj Gradec Basin represents one of the marginal western basins of the Neogene Pannonian Basin system. Its sedimentary succession is investigated by combination of field, petrographic and geochemical methods. The succession is at least 540 m thick and characterised by frequent alternation of conglomerate, sandstone, siltstone and marlstone deposited in terrestrial, brackish and shallow marine environments. Modal composition of the sandstones indicates that they originated from recycled orogen, namely from quartzose sedimentary rocks of the Eastern Alps, and show moderate to absent chemical weathering. The results indicate two different tectonic settings: a collisional, which correlates well with the end-Mesozoic and Cenozoic Alpine collision, resulting in orogeny and thrusting of the Austroalpine nappes, and a passive margin related to the early Neogene lithospheric extension and subsidence as the result of slab retreat in the Carpathian subduction zone, which was responsible for the formation of the Pannonian Basin system. In this area, where the sediments were subjected to various tectonic events, discriminant function diagrams of Verma and Armstrong Altrin are found to be a good tool for their identification and differentiation. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available