4.2 Article

Alcohol marketing on social media: young adults engage with alcohol marketing on facebook

Journal

ADDICTION RESEARCH & THEORY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 273-284

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/16066359.2016.1245293

Keywords

Alcohol marketing; Facebook; health promotion; social networking; young adults

Funding

  1. Marsden Fund Council from NZ Government [MAU0911]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Young adults are highly-active users of social network sites such as Facebook for their everyday friendship socializing. Alcohol companies have strategically used Facebook to embed their alcohol marketing into young adults' social networking friendship activities, blurring the lines between user and alcohol brand generated content. This study explored mechanisms through which commercial alcohol interests interact with young adults' online friendship practices and how young adults engage with this online alcohol marketing.Method: Researcher-participant online Facebook interviews were conducted with seven (4 females, 3 males) New Zealand young adults (18-25 years). The interviews were recorded using data screen-capture software to track participants' online navigation and audiovisual recording of the conversation and non-verbal behaviors.Results: Our social constructionist thematic analysis identified that online alcohol marketing is obscured within friendship endorsing and invitations to drink; taken up as content for Facebook friendship fun; and objected to as intrusions into online friendship activities.Conclusions: Social media alcohol marketing encourages alcohol consumption through new forms of promotion and the exploitation of networked peer group friendship practices. The interaction between young adults' online friendship practices and alcohol marketers as friends inside these practices needs urgent attention by policymakers seeking to reduce alcohol consumption.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available